Trust model
See how ZYNC combines published rules, scoped authority, evidence, holds, audit history, and challenge paths.
ZYNC does not ask participants to trust one opaque score or one all-powerful operator.
The trust model uses several layers:
- Mission terms published before participation;
- proof appropriate to the action and value;
- scoped team permissions;
- recorded decisions and policy versions;
- holds before high-risk irreversible actions;
- reconciliation and monitoring;
- challenge and dispute paths;
- incident response and transparent correction.
Trust remains contextual
A person can be a trusted contributor in one Space without gaining authority in another. A Sponsor can receive agreed campaign evidence without seeing unrelated Member activity. A reviewer can decide a submission without controlling funding.
No system eliminates fraud, error, service failure, or policy disagreement. ZYNC’s goal is to make these risks bounded, observable, and recoverable.
When a decision changes, history should show the change. When an incident affects a public promise, status communication should explain the affected service, Member impact, containment, and resolution.