Verification
Learn how ZYNC connects submitted proof, declared rules, review decisions, and a challenge path.
Verification is the connection between a claimed action and the evidence that supports it. ZYNC does not treat every click, upload, or social signal as equally trustworthy.
A Mission publishes a verification policy before participation. That policy describes acceptable evidence, the checks applied, the decision states, and whether a human reviewer is required. It can combine several kinds of proof rather than trusting one easy-to-fake signal.
A decision, not a score alone
Verification may use automated signals to organize work or detect risk, but the result must still map to an understandable decision. A Member should be able to see whether a submission is waiting, approved, rejected, held, or challenged.
Humanity and uniqueness
Some Missions need stronger confidence that one real person is participating fairly. The required confidence should match the value and abuse risk of the action. Higher-risk cases can require more independent signals.
Challenges matter
A rejection should not become unanswerable authority. Where the Mission policy allows it, the Member can challenge the decision and a reviewer can re-examine the evidence with a recorded outcome.
Verification is strongest when it is proportionate, explainable, and published before the work begins.